The Blocker: The "Transactional" Annotation Trap You have meticulously designed your Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters). You have a pristine Domain layer and a segregated Application (Use Case) layer. You have stripped away all frameworks from your core. Then, you write a Use Case that requires atomicity: Deduct inventory. Charge the credit card. Save the order. If any step fails, all must fail. The instinct is to reach for a framework-specific annotation (like Spring’s @Transactional or NestJS interceptors) and slap it on the Use Case method. Stop. The moment you import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional (or similar) into your Use Case layer, you have violated the Dependency Rule . Your inner circle now depends on a framework mechanism living in the outer circle. You are no longer framework-agnostic. If you swap the persistence adapter or the framework, your business logic breaks. The Root Cause: Mixing Business Boun...
Practical programming blog with step-by-step tutorials, production-ready code, performance and security tips, and API/AI integration guides. Coverage: Next.js, React, Angular, Node.js, Python, Java, .NET, SQL/NoSQL, GraphQL, Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD, cloud (Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud) and AI APIs (OpenAI, ChatGPT, Anthropic, Claude, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, Qwen AI, Perplexity AI. Grok AI, Meta AI). Fast, high-value solutions for developers.