Skip to main content

Stop Windsurf Cascade from Ignoring .windsurf Rules and Context

 There is nothing more frustrating than spending hours configuring your .windsurf rules, only to have Cascade (Windsurf’s AI agent) completely ignore them during a complex refactor. You define strict architectural patterns, variable naming conventions, and preferred libraries, but five prompts into a session, the AI "drifts." It starts suggesting deprecated libraries, hallucinating files, or asking to re-read documents it should already have indexed.

This isn't just a quirk; it’s a breakdown in context management. If you want a reliable AI coding partner, you must stop treating the prompt bar like a chat window and start treating it like a compiler input.

Here is the technical breakdown of why Cascade loses focus and the rigorous configuration required to lock it in.

The Root Cause: Context Window Saturation vs. RAG Latency

To fix the problem, we must understand the architecture of the failure. Windsurf, powered by Codeium, utilizes a hybrid approach of a Context Window (active memory) and RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation—indexing your codebase).

1. The Context Dilution

LLMs have a fixed token limit. As your conversation with Cascade grows, the "sliding window" of context moves forward. If your critical rules were defined at the start of the chat or loosely in a configuration file that hasn't been referenced recently, they get pushed out of the active token space. The AI literally "forgets" them because they no longer exist in the data sent to the inference engine for that specific turn.

2. RAG Hallucinations

When Cascade searches your codebase to answer a query, it performs a vector search. If your .windsurf rule file is too verbose or lacks semantic distinctiveness, the vector search may rank it lower than actual code files.

For example, if you have a rule: "Always use Shadcn UI buttons," but you have 50 files containing existing legacy HTML buttons, the RAG system might retrieve the legacy buttons as "context" instead of the rule file, simply due to the volume of matches.

The Fix: Structured Rule Injection

Generic advice tells you to "remind the AI." That is inefficient. The solution is to create a semantic anchor—a highly structured rule file that forces high-ranking retrieval—and enforce a specific prompting protocol.

We will implement a System Protocol file using XML-like tagging, which modern LLMs parse with significantly higher accuracy than natural language prose.

Step 1: Create the Master Rule File

Do not rely on scattered instructions. Create a file named .windsurf/rules.md (or .windsurfrules depending on your specific version preference, though Markdown ensures better parsing).

Paste the following configuration. This is optimized for a modern React/Next.js stack, but the structure applies to any language.

<!-- .windsurf/rules.md -->
<system_protocol>
  <meta>
    <project_type>Next.js 14 (App Router)</project_type>
    <strict_mode>true</strict_mode>
  </meta>

  <critical_constraints>
    <!-- AI must refuse to generate code violating these -->
    <rule id="no_client_components_default">
      All components are Server Components by default. Only add 'use client' if using useState, useEffect, or event listeners.
    </rule>
    <rule id="styling">
      Use Tailwind CSS exclusively. No CSS-in-JS. No module.css.
    </rule>
    <rule id="imports">
      Use absolute imports (@/components/...) strictly. No relative paths (../../).
    </rule>
  </critical_constraints>

  <code_style>
    <type_safety>
      TypeScript Zod validation is required for all API routes.
      No "any" types. Use "unknown" if necessary.
    </type_safety>
    <functional_patterns>
      Prefer immutable data structures. Avoid classes for state management; use hooks.
    </functional_patterns>
  </code_style>

  <workflow>
    <step>Check existing files before creating new ones.</step>
    <step>If a file exists, read it completely before suggesting edits.</step>
  </workflow>
</system_protocol>

Step 2: Explicit Context Pinning

Windsurf allows you to "pin" context. Users often pin the file they are working on, but they fail to pin the rules.

The Strategy: For every new Cascade session intended for complex work, explicitly pin .windsurf/rules.md as the first item in the context. This forces the rules into the "System Prompt" area of the context window, giving them the highest weighted attention.

Step 3: The "Priming" Prompt

Don't start with "Build a login form." Start with a priming prompt that forces Cascade to ingest the rules we just defined.

Input this prompt immediately after pinning the rules file:

"Read @.windsurf/rules.md. Acknowledge the critical constraints and project stack. Ingest these rules as the primary filter for all code generation in this session. Confirm by listing the 3 critical constraints."

This forces the LLM to generate tokens related to your rules, moving them from "passive reference" to "active memory."

Implementation: Seeing It In Action

Let's look at a scenario where this prevents a common error. We want to create a user profile card. Without the rules, Cascade might generate a standard React component using standard CSS.

With the rules primed, here is how we request the feature and how the AI validates it.

User Prompt:

"Generate a UserProfile component that takes a user object and displays their avatar and bio."

Resulting Code (generated by Cascade with Rule adherence):

// src/components/UserProfile.tsx
import { Avatar, AvatarFallback, AvatarImage } from "@/components/ui/avatar";
import { Card, CardContent, CardHeader, CardTitle } from "@/components/ui/card";
import { type User } from "@/types/db"; // Adhering to strict typing

// Rule enforcement: Server Component by default (no 'use client')
interface UserProfileProps {
  user: User;
}

export function UserProfile({ user }: UserProfileProps) {
  // Rule enforcement: Tailwind CSS only
  return (
    <Card className="w-full max-w-sm border-slate-200 shadow-sm">
      <CardHeader className="flex flex-row items-center gap-4">
        <Avatar>
          <AvatarImage src={user.image} alt={user.name} />
          <AvatarFallback>{user.name.charAt(0)}</AvatarFallback>
        </Avatar>
        <div className="flex flex-col">
          <CardTitle className="text-lg font-semibold text-slate-900">
            {user.name}
          </CardTitle>
          <p className="text-sm text-slate-500">@{user.username}</p>
        </div>
      </CardHeader>
      <CardContent>
        <p className="text-sm leading-relaxed text-slate-700">
          {user.bio || "No bio provided."}
        </p>
      </CardContent>
    </Card>
  );
}

Why this output is correct:

  1. Server Component: It did not add 'use client' because there is no state, strictly following the <rule id="no_client_components_default">.
  2. Tailwind: It used utility classes, ignoring style={{}} or CSS modules.
  3. Absolute Imports: It utilized @/components rather than ../../components.

Deep Dive: Why XML Tags Work Better

You might wonder why we wrapped the rules in <system_protocol> tags.

Modern LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, etc.) are fine-tuned on vast amounts of XML and HTML data. When you structure prompts hierarchically:

  1. Scoped Attention: The model understands that everything inside <critical_constraints> represents a "hard stop" logic gate.
  2. Delimiter Clarity: Natural language is ambiguous. Does "stop using classes" mean CSS classes or JavaScript classes? By placing it under <code_style><functional_patterns>, the semantic meaning becomes strictly JavaScript/TypeScript related.
  3. Token Efficiency: Structured data is denser. It conveys more meaning with fewer tokens than long-winded paragraphs explaining what you want.

Handling Edge Cases and "Context Drift"

Even with this setup, extremely long sessions (50+ interactions) will eventually suffer from context drift.

The "Reset" Protocol

If Cascade starts ignoring rules again:

  1. Do NOT argue with the AI. Telling it "You forgot the rule" wastes tokens and often reinforces the error.
  2. Delete the Session. Start a fresh Cascade chat.
  3. Re-pin the Rules.
  4. Summary Paste: If you need context from the previous chat, ask Cascade to "Summarize technical progress as a bulleted list," copy that list, and paste it into the new session along with your rule file.

Multiple Rule Sets

For monorepos, create specific rule files:

  • .windsurf/backend_rules.md (Python/FastAPI specific)
  • .windsurf/frontend_rules.md (React/Next.js specific)

Only pin the file relevant to your current task. Pinning both dilutes the attention mechanism.

Conclusion

Windsurf is a powerful tool, but it is nondeterministic by nature. It does not "know" your code; it predicts the next likely token based on probability. By implementing a strict .windsurf/rules.md file using XML delimiting and enforcing a session priming protocol, you shift those probabilities significantly in your favor.

Stop hoping Cascade remembers. Architect your context so it cannot forget.