Skip to main content

Manus AI vs. Windsurf: Which Agent Handles Large Enterprise Repositories Better?

 The era of "chatting with your code" is over. We have entered the era of Agentic Engineering.

For CTOs and Engineering Leads managing decade-old monoliths—where a single variable change can crash production services three layers deep—the choice of AI tooling isn't about productivity; it is about risk mitigation.

You are likely stuck in analysis paralysis between Manus AI (representing the new wave of fully autonomous agents) and Windsurf (Codeium’s IDE that emphasizes "Flow" and deep context).

This article strips away the marketing hype to analyze how these tools function within the constraints of massive, undocumented legacy repositories. We will provide a technical framework for choosing the right tool and a custom engineered solution to bridge the gap between them.

The Core Problem: The Context Window vs. The Dependency Graph

The frustration your team feels isn't just about AI hallucinations; it is a fundamental architectural mismatch.

Most LLM-based coding tools rely on RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation). When you ask a question, the tool vectorizes your query, searches a database of code snippets, and feeds the top matches to the LLM.

Why RAG Fails Enterprise Monoliths

In a clean, modern Next.js project, RAG works perfectly. In a 5GB enterprise Java/TypeScript monolith, it fails catastrophically for three reasons:

  1. Implicit Coupling: Legacy code often relies on global state, side effects, or complex dependency injection containers that standard lexical search cannot detect.
  2. The "needle in the haystack" problem: If you ask an agent to "refactor the User model," RAG might retrieve the model definition but miss the 400 microservices that implicitly rely on a specific database column name.
  3. Hallucinated APIs: In internal proprietary frameworks, the AI has no public training data. If it doesn't retrieve the exact interface definition, it guesses—and in enterprise code, guesses cause outages.

The Contenders: Autonomy vs. Deep Context

To solve this, Manus AI and Windsurf take diametrically opposite technical approaches.

Windsurf: The "Deep Context" Approach

Windsurf (powered by Codeium) utilizes a concept called Cascades. Instead of just indexing text, it attempts to understand the flow of data.

  • Mechanism: It acts as a deep-integration IDE. It keeps the human in the loop (HITL).
  • Strength: It excels at traversing the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) locally. If you highlight a function, it knows exactly where it is called.
  • Best For: Active refactoring, understanding complex control flow, and immediate code generation where the developer guides the architecture.

Manus AI: The "Autonomous Agent" Approach

Manus AI operates as a virtual employee. It doesn't just "read" code; it has tool use capabilities (terminal access, file system access).

  • Mechanism: It creates a plan, executes shell commands, runs tests, reads error logs, and iterates.
  • Strength: It can handle grunt work that requires trial and error, such as upgrading an npm dependency across 50 packages in a monorepo.
  • Best For: Asynchronous tasks, test generation, and broad migrations where running the compiler is necessary to validate changes.

The Technical Verdict

If your repository is a legacy spaghetti monolith where the build process is fragile: Windsurf wins.

Autonomous agents like Manus often get stuck in "loops of doom" on fragile codebases. They try to fix a build error, introduce a new one, fix that, and eventually drift the codebase away from its original intent. Windsurf keeps the developer’s intent primary while providing the intelligence of the LLM.

However, relying solely on the tool's native indexing is insufficient for enterprise scale. You need to engineer a "Context Bridge."

The Fix: Engineering a Context Bridge

To make either tool effective in a large repo, you cannot rely on their default indexing. You must generate a Source Map of Truth.

We will write a custom script using ts-morph (a TypeScript AST wrapper) to generate a digestible Markdown architectural summary. You feed this summary to Windsurf or Manus to "ground" them in reality.

This script solves the "Implicit Coupling" problem by forcing the AI to look at the strict dependency graph.

Implementation: The AST Context Generator

Create a file named generate-context.ts. This script analyzes a specific entry point and outputs a graph of all interfaces and exports, stripping away implementation details to save context window space.

Prerequisites:

npm install ts-morph

The Code:

import { Project, SyntaxKind, Node } from "ts-morph";
import * as fs from "node:fs/promises";
import * as path from "node:path";

// Configuration: Point this to your tsconfig.json
const TS_CONFIG_PATH = path.resolve("tsconfig.json");
const ENTRY_FILE = path.resolve("src/legacy/GodComponent.tsx");

async function generateContextMap() {
  console.log("Initializing Project from tsconfig...");
  
  const project = new Project({
    tsConfigFilePath: TS_CONFIG_PATH,
    skipAddingFilesFromTsConfig: true, // Performance optimization for massive repos
  });

  console.log(`Analyzing entry point: ${ENTRY_FILE}`);
  const sourceFile = project.addSourceFileAtPath(ENTRY_FILE);

  let outputMarkdown = `# Architectural Context: ${sourceFile.getBaseName()}\n\n`;

  // 1. Extract Interface Definitions (The Contract)
  const interfaces = sourceFile.getInterfaces();
  outputMarkdown += "## Interfaces\n";
  
  interfaces.forEach((intf) => {
    outputMarkdown += `### ${intf.getName()}\n\`\`\`typescript\n`;
    outputMarkdown += intf.getText(); 
    outputMarkdown += "\n\`\`\`\n\n";
  });

  // 2. Analyze Imports to determine Coupling
  const imports = sourceFile.getImportDeclarations();
  outputMarkdown += "## Dependency Graph (Coupling)\n";
  
  imports.forEach((imp) => {
    const moduleSpecifier = imp.getModuleSpecifierValue();
    // Filter out 3rd party node_modules to focus on internal coupling
    if (moduleSpecifier.startsWith(".")) {
      outputMarkdown += `- **Internal Dependency**: \`${moduleSpecifier}\`\n`;
      // Deep Dive: Peek at the imported file's public API (Optional depth)
      try {
        const importedSource = imp.getModuleSpecifierSourceFile();
        if (importedSource) {
          const publicExports = importedSource.getExportedDeclarations();
          outputMarkdown += `  - Exports: ${Array.from(publicExports.keys()).join(", ")}\n`;
        }
      } catch (e) {
        // Fallback for broken paths in legacy code
        outputMarkdown += `  - (Could not resolve AST for this dependency)\n`;
      }
    }
  });

  // 3. Extract Class/Component Signatures (No Implementation)
  const classes = sourceFile.getClasses();
  outputMarkdown += "## Component Signatures\n";
  
  classes.forEach((cls) => {
    outputMarkdown += `### Class: ${cls.getName()}\n`;
    
    // Extract methods but strip body to save context window
    cls.getMethods().forEach((method) => {
      const signature = method.getSignature().getDeclaration();
      outputMarkdown += `- \`${signature.getText().split("{")[0]}\`\n`;
    });
    outputMarkdown += "\n";
  });

  await fs.writeFile("CONTEXT_MAP.md", outputMarkdown);
  console.log("✅ Context Map generated at CONTEXT_MAP.md");
}

generateContextMap().catch(console.error);

How to Use This

  1. Run the script: npx tsx generate-context.ts
  2. Open Windsurf.
  3. Open the Chat/Cascade panel.
  4. Prompt: "Refactor GodComponent.tsx. I have generated an AST map of its dependencies and interfaces. Please use the contents of @CONTEXT_MAP.md as your strict source of truth for types and external calls."

Deep Dive: Why This Works

This approach works because it shifts the burden from Probabilistic Retrieval to Deterministic Analysis.

When you rely on Windsurf or Manus to "read the codebase," they are making probability-based guesses on which chunks of text are relevant. By using ts-morph to walk the Abstract Syntax Tree, we are mathematically guaranteeing that the relationships are accurate.

We feed the AI the structure (metadata) rather than the substance (raw code). This maximizes the efficacy of the LLM's reasoning capabilities while minimizing the noise that leads to hallucinations.

The "Cascade" Effect

In Windsurf, this technique is particularly potent. Windsurf's "Cascade" feature allows it to be aware of the file you are editing and the files you explicitly reference. By referencing the CONTEXT_MAP.md, you essentially inject a condensed knowledge graph of the entire legacy module into the active context window.

Common Pitfalls and Edge Cases

1. The Circular Dependency Trap

Legacy enterprise code is notorious for circular dependencies.

  • Risk: An autonomous agent like Manus might try to break a cycle by moving code, inadvertently breaking the build order in a webpack config it doesn't understand.
  • Solution: Use the AST script to identify circular imports (where File A imports B, and B imports A) before letting the AI touch the code.

2. The "Any" Type Contagion

  • Risk: If your legacy code uses any, the AI will likely continue using any to avoid type errors.
  • Solution: Explicitly instruct Windsurf: "Strict Mode: Do not introduce new any types. If a type is unknown, create a provisional interface named ILegacyUnknown."

3. Build System Blindness

  • Risk: AI tools understand code logic but rarely understand custom build pipelines (Bazel, Gradle, custom Gulp scripts).
  • Solution: Never allow an autonomous agent to modify configuration files (package.json, tsconfig.json) without explicit human review.

Conclusion

For massive enterprise repositories:

  1. Use Windsurf as your daily driver. Its ability to integrate with the local file system and leverage deep context without breaking the "human-in-the-loop" safety net is crucial for maintaining legacy stability.
  2. Use Manus AI (or similar agents) strictly for isolated, verified tasks, such as writing unit tests for a specific file or generating documentation.
  3. Implement the AST Context Bridge. Don't trust the AI to index your code. Generate the map yourself and force the AI to read the map.

The future of maintaining legacy code isn't about replacing developers; it's about equipping them with tools that can see through the spaghetti. By combining Windsurf's deep context with deterministic AST analysis, you can finally refactor the un-refactorable.

Labels: