Skip to main content

Troubleshooting MongoDB 'Sort Exceeded Memory Limit' Without allowDiskUse

 You have likely encountered this error in your logs, usually causing a 500 status code on a production endpoint:

Error Code 16819: Sort exceeded memory limit of 104857600 bytes, but did not opt in to external sorting. Aborting operation.

The immediate reaction is often to add { allowDiskUse: true } to the aggregation options. While this eliminates the error, it is a performance patch, not a fix. It forces MongoDB to spill the data into temporary files on the disk to perform the sort. Disk I/O is orders of magnitude slower than RAM, meaning you have successfully traded a crash for high latency.

To truly fix this—and scale your application—you must optimize your indexing strategy to avoid the in-memory sort entirely.

The Root Cause: Blocking Sort

MongoDB has a strict internal limit of 100MB of RAM for blocking sort operations.

A Blocking Sort occurs when the execution plan cannot obtain the sort order from an index. Consequently, MongoDB must:

  1. Fetch all documents matching the query filter into memory.
  2. Perform a sorting algorithm on that dataset in RAM.
  3. Return the results.

If the dataset size exceeds 100MB, the operation aborts. By leveraging an index, MongoDB can walk the B-Tree data structure—which is already sorted—and retrieve documents in the requested order without buffering them in memory.

The Scenario

Let's assume a standard E-Commerce MERN stack scenario. We have a high-volume Orders collection, and we want to retrieve the 20 most recent orders for a specific user.

The Schema

import mongoose, { Schema, Document } from 'mongoose';

interface IOrder extends Document {
  userId: mongoose.Types.ObjectId;
  totalAmount: number;
  status: 'pending' | 'shipped' | 'delivered' | 'cancelled';
  createdAt: Date;
}

const OrderSchema = new Schema<IOrder>({
  userId: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, required: true },
  totalAmount: { type: Number, required: true },
  status: { type: String, required: true },
  createdAt: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
});

// Notice: We only have a single field index on userId currently
OrderSchema.index({ userId: 1 });

export const OrderModel = mongoose.model<IOrder>('Order', OrderSchema);

The Problematic Query

Here is the aggregation pipeline causing the memory exception. The user has thousands of orders, and the documents are heavy (perhaps containing embedded shipping logs or large arrays).

async function getRecentUserOrders(targetUserId: string) {
  try {
    const results = await OrderModel.aggregate([
      // Stage 1: Filter by User
      { 
        $match: { 
          userId: new mongoose.Types.ObjectId(targetUserId),
          status: 'delivered' 
        } 
      },
      // Stage 2: Sort by Date (Descending)
      // THIS is where the memory overflow happens
      { $sort: { createdAt: -1 } },
      // Stage 3: Pagination
      { $limit: 20 }
    ]);
    
    return results;
  } catch (error) {
    console.error("Aggregation failed:", error);
    throw error;
  }
}

Why it fails: Although we have an index on userId, the query engine uses it to find the documents, loads all of them into memory, and then attempts to sort them by createdAt. If the user has enough history, the 100MB limit is breached.

The Fix: The ESR Rule (Equality, Sort, Range)

To bypass the in-memory sort, we must create a Compound Index following the ESR Rule. The index keys must be listed in this exact order:

  1. Equality: Fields listed in exact matches (e.g., userId, status).
  2. Sort: Fields used for sorting (e.g., createdAt).
  3. Range: Fields used for range filters (e.g., $gt, $lt).

Step 1: Create the Compound Index

We need an index that covers both the $match conditions and the $sort condition.

// Add this to your schema definition or run via MongoDB shell
// 1. match userId (Equality)
// 2. match status (Equality)
// 3. sort by createdAt (Sort)
OrderSchema.index({ userId: 1, status: 1, createdAt: -1 });

Step 2: verifyExecution (The "Explain" Plan)

Before deploying, verify that the query utilizes the index for sorting. We check the winningPlan using the explain method.

async function debugQueryPlan(targetUserId: string) {
  const explainResult = await OrderModel.aggregate([
    { 
      $match: { 
        userId: new mongoose.Types.ObjectId(targetUserId),
        status: 'delivered' 
      } 
    },
    { $sort: { createdAt: -1 } },
    { $limit: 20 }
  ]).explain('executionStats');

  // We are looking for the 'stage' in the winning plan.
  // BAD: "SORT" (indicates in-memory blocking sort)
  // GOOD: "IXSCAN" (indicates index scan) with no "SORT" stage
  
  const stages = explainResult.executionStats.executionStages;
  console.dir(stages, { depth: null });
}

If the optimization works, the execution stages will look similar to this structure:

  1. IXSCAN: Scans the { userId: 1, status: 1, createdAt: -1 } index.
  2. FETCH: Retrieves the actual documents.
  3. LIMIT: Stops after 20 documents.

Crucially, there is no SORT stage. The database effectively jumps to the section of the index for that user and status, reads the first 20 entries (which are physically stored in sorted order in the B-Tree), and returns. Memory usage is negligible.

Pipeline Order Matters

For this optimization to work, the $sort stage must appear immediately after the $match stage. If you place a projection or transformation before the sort, MongoDB "forgets" the index order.

Incorrect Pipeline (Breaks Index Sort):

// ❌ This will trigger memory limits again
await OrderModel.aggregate([
  { $match: { userId: targetId } },
  // Projection creates new documents in memory that are not linked to the index
  { $project: { totalAmount: 1, createdAt: 1 } }, 
  { $sort: { createdAt: -1 } } 
]);

Correct Pipeline:

// ✅ Sorts based on index first, then projects
await OrderModel.aggregate([
  { $match: { userId: targetId } },
  { $sort: { createdAt: -1 } },
  { $project: { totalAmount: 1, createdAt: 1 } }
]);

Summary

When you hit Error 16819, do not reach for allowDiskUse. It masks architectural issues.

  1. Identify the specific query failing the sort.
  2. Apply the ESR (Equality, Sort, Range) rule to design a compound index.
  3. Ensure your $sort stage immediately follows your $match stage.
  4. Verify with .explain() that the SORT stage has vanished from the execution plan.

This approach resolves the memory error and significantly increases the throughput of your database by reducing CPU usage and I/O wait times.

Labels: