Binary vs. XML Serialization in C#: Key Differences Decoded

Serialization in C# is an essential mechanism for converting objects into a format that can be stored or transmitted and later reconstructed. Two commonly used serialization formats are Binary Serialization and XML Serialization. Each has distinct advantages and use cases, making them suitable for different scenarios.

In this blog post, we will dive deep into both Binary and XML Serialization in C#, exploring their key differences, use cases, performance comparisons, and best practices for implementation.

What is Serialization in C#?

Serialization is the process of converting an object into a format that can be easily stored (e.g., in a file or database) or transferred over a network. The deserialization process reverses this operation, reconstructing the object from its serialized form.

C# provides multiple serialization techniques, with Binary and XML Serialization being two of the most prominent.

What is Binary Serialization?

Binary Serialization is the process of converting an object into a binary format. It is compact and efficient but not human-readable. Binary Serialization is often used for performance-critical applications where speed and storage efficiency matter.

How to Implement Binary Serialization in C#

C# provides the BinaryFormatter class for binary serialization (though it is now obsolete due to security concerns). The recommended approach is to use System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary with caution or opt for System.Text.Json or MessagePack for safer alternatives.

Example of Binary Serialization in C#:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary;

[Serializable]
class Person
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Person person = new Person { Name = "John Doe", Age = 30 };
        BinaryFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();

        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream("person.dat", FileMode.Create))
        {
            formatter.Serialize(stream, person);
        }

        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream("person.dat", FileMode.Open))
        {
            Person deserializedPerson = (Person)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
            Console.WriteLine($"Name: {deserializedPerson.Name}, Age: {deserializedPerson.Age}");
        }
    }
}

Pros and Cons of Binary Serialization

Pros:

• High Performance: Faster than XML serialization.

• Compact Data Size: Requires less space compared to XML.

• Supports Complex Objects: Can serialize private fields and cyclic references.

Cons:

• Not Human-Readable: Difficult to debug and inspect.

• Versioning Issues: Changes to the class structure can break deserialization.

• Security Risks: BinaryFormatter is vulnerable to attacks and should be avoided in untrusted scenarios.

---

What is XML Serialization?

XML Serialization converts an object into an XML format, making it human-readable and widely interoperable with other systems.

How to Implement XML Serialization in C#

C# provides the XmlSerializer class in the System.Xml.Serialization namespace for XML serialization.

Example of XML Serialization in C#:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Xml.Serialization;

public class Person
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Person person = new Person { Name = "Jane Doe", Age = 25 };
        XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(Person));

        using (StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter("person.xml"))
        {
            serializer.Serialize(writer, person);
        }

        using (StreamReader reader = new StreamReader("person.xml"))
        {
            Person deserializedPerson = (Person)serializer.Deserialize(reader);
            Console.WriteLine($"Name: {deserializedPerson.Name}, Age: {deserializedPerson.Age}");
        }
    }
}

Pros and Cons of XML Serialization

Pros:

• Human-Readable: Easy to inspect and debug.

• Interoperable: Can be used across different platforms and languages.

• Safer: Does not execute arbitrary code during deserialization.

Cons:

• Performance Overhead: Slower than binary serialization.

• Larger File Size: XML format is verbose and requires more storage.

• Limited Support for Complex Objects: Does not serialize private fields or reference types.

---

Binary vs. XML Serialization: Key Differences

Feature	Binary Serialization	XML Serialization
Format	Binary	XML (Text-Based)
Readability	Not Human-Readable	Human-Readable
Performance	Faster	Slower
Storage Size	Smaller	Larger
Interoperability	Limited	High (Cross-Platform)
Security	Vulnerable to attacks	Safer
Serialization of Private Fields	Yes	No
Versioning Support	Difficult	Easier to Manage

---

Best Practices for Using Serialization in C#

1. Avoid BinaryFormatter for Security Reasons: Use System.Text.Json, MessagePack, or Protobuf for binary serialization.

2. Use XML Serialization for Interoperability: When working with external APIs, XML serialization is a good choice.

3. Compress XML for Performance Optimization: GZip compression can reduce XML file sizes.

4. Use JSON Instead of XML in Modern Applications: JSON is more compact and widely supported.

5. Implement Custom Serialization When Needed: Use ISerializable or DataContractSerializer for more control.

---

Conclusion

Both Binary and XML Serialization have their strengths and weaknesses.

• Binary Serialization is ideal for performance-critical applications but lacks readability and security.

• XML Serialization is human-readable and cross-platform but can be slower and larger in size.

For modern C# applications, alternatives like JSON Serialization (System.Text.Json) and MessagePack often provide better performance and security. Choose the right serialization method based on your application's needs.